Retirement income security on your terms

Vanguard research suggests that one practical answer may lie in pairing traditional target-date funds with a modest allocation to deferred-income annuities (DIA). According to Making Guaranteed Income Target-Date Funds Work in the Real World: Annuitization Benefits and Product Design, a recently published paper by Vanguard’s Ankul Daga, Vibhor Dave, and Matthew Tufano, a target-date fund with a carefully designed deferred-income annuity sleeve inside can meaningfully improve late-in-life income security—while preserving flexibility for participants who choose not to annuitize. 

The paper finds that combining a conventional TDF with a modest sleeve earmarked for guaranteed lifetime income can help create a late-in-life income floor in the scenarios participants fear most—outliving their savings, often amid weak or volatile markets. This approach is designed to address a core gap in retirement planning.

For participants focused on retirement income security, the pairing offers a familiar, low-cost TDF supplemented by a durable source of lifetime income, without requiring a full commitment to annuitization.

“TDFs manage accumulation and investment risk systematically over a participant’s working life, and annuities manage longevity risk—the uncertainty of not knowing how long retirement income needs to last,” Dave said. “Together, they address participant needs throughout their lives, not just the accumulation phase.”

Our analysis compared guaranteed income TDFs allocating to three types of lifetime-income annuities: immediate annuities, DIAs, and longevity-only income that begins later in retirement. Of these, deferred-income designs emerged as the most consistently effective at improving late-in-life income security across diverse participant cohorts.

The research examined:

• Single premium immediate annuities (SPIAs), which begin paying income at retirement and are funded using 25% of the account balance at retirement.
• DIAs, which are funded ahead of retirement, with income beginning at retirement and an allocation capped at 25%.
• Qualified longevity annuity contract (QLAC)-style income, which begins later in retirement (that is, age 80 and beyond) and is funded using a smaller allocation, typically 10% of the balance at retirement.

When we assessed outcomes across participant cohorts defined by gender, income, education, and health, deferred-income designs delivered the strongest, most robust improvements in late-in-life consumption security.

“In our analysis, a modest deferred-income sleeve—capped at approximately 25% of the portfolio—can meaningfully improve late-life consumption security for participants who live longer while preserving some growth potential or liquidity,” Daga said. “Other annuity options may be effective for some, but their value can be more sensitive to spending rules and timing.”

“Change in certainty equivalent” is a term used to express the differences in bequest and income between TDFs with various guaranteed income options and TDFs that don’t include these options.

Source: Making Guaranteed Income Target-Date Funds Work in the Real World: Annuitization Benefits and Product Design (Vanguard, 2026). 

Most importantly, DIA TDFs are designed to preserve participant choice. Research consistently shows that most participants do not annuitize, and plan sponsors should assume that many will continue to do so even if the plan selects a TDF with a guaranteed income option.¹

“The research is clear that heterogeneity matters,” Dave said. “Participants with shorter expected horizons, smaller balances, or high Social Security coverage may be indifferent to a deferred-income sleeve, or in some cases better off without it. A well-designed guaranteed income TDF should build in protections for these types of participants.”

These guidelines are central to the paper’s conclusions and to the practical design of DIA-based guaranteed income TDFs. They include:

• Limiting annuity allocations (about 25%), which are designed to help preserve market participation and long-term growth opportunities across participant groups.
• Balance thresholds or communications that help ensure that liquidity-constrained participants retain a meaningful buffer before any assets are directed toward guaranteed income; plan sponsors might want to communicate that those with small balances might opt out or allocate less.
• A clear path to opt-out of guaranteed income  and plain-language disclosure of the trade-offs associated with annuitization—more income security with less liquid wealth.

Together, these guardrails support population-level benefits of DIA TDFs while limiting predictable downside cases. Vanguard’s research offers practical ways to enhance retirement security by providing a steady income floor in old age. “A modest, deferred-income sleeve can improve outcomes for most retirees while minimizing the risk for those who choose not to annuitize,” Daga said.